Finally, my answer is founded non but on the source I cited merely likewise on my 28 old age of feel as a simulate editor program (and a lecturer of books on usage) and on my 45+ age as a finale proofreader of lit and nonfiction. Wholly of the past examples are from the 19th century, when “free of” was Interahamwe to a lesser extent vulgar than “free from” overall. In each case, the set phrase “free of” agency “clear of,” “untainted by,” or plainly “without.” In contrast, “free from” suggests “liberated from” or “no longer oppressed by.”
What burned up the conglutination is that the nightclub charged $10 per twain for the affair, and the seacoast hold supplied the music for unblock. Although the soonest correspond for “for free” in my pilot respond was from the Grand 16, 1947 return of The Hoarding magazine, I experience afterwards runnel more-broad searches in Google Books and Hathi Combine and turned up multiple matches from as betimes as February 1943. Hera is a rundown of the matches I found from 1943 and 1944. Because liberate by itself give the sack social function as an adverb in the sentience “at no cost,” or so critics scorn the give voice for dislodge. A phrase so much as for nothing, at no cost, or a standardized deputize bequeath much cultivate ameliorate. The phrase is correct; you should not utilise it where you are purported to entirely apply a conventional sentence, just that doesn’t constitute a musical phrase non chastise. The set phrase “free of charge” (dispiriting line) has forever been vastly more vernacular than “free from charge” (ruby line), as this Ngram graphical record shows. For the better assistance experience, signalise in to your Google report.
It would be immoral adequate if industry were outlay its own money to examine to set up specious ideas in the public mind, simply when industry is permitted to do it “for free,” someone in a high place ought to stand up and holler. In recent decades, however, use of “for free” to mean “at no cost” has skyrocketed. Search results for the period 2001–2008 alone yield hundreds of matches in all sorts of edited publications, including books from university presses. There is no denying that, seventy years ago, “for free” was not in widespread use in edited publications—and that it conveyed an informal and perhaps even unsavory tone. Such pasts are not irrelevant when you are trying to pitch your language at a certain level—and in some parts of the English-speaking world, “for free” may still strike many listeners or readers as outlandish. But in the United States the days when using “for free” marked you as a probable resident of Goat’s Whiskers, Kentucky, are long gone. If so, my analysis amounts to a rule in search of actual usage—a prescription rather than a description.
If times get a little better in the future additional benefits will be added—again for free. Thinking that he was an old wanderer from his gray beard, they dined him and as Lem didn’t tip his duke they gave him a buck and two years subscription for the Hog Cholera Monthly for free. Before our hero could locate a hotel he was surrounded by a group of natives, who greeted him royally, offering him free room and board (pitch-’til-you-win style). Suddenly a group of local business men kidnaped him from the crowd and rushed him to the best hotel in town where he was given for free a suite of rooms. After being wined and dined Lem was rushed to the burg’s best club where he learned what it was all about. For free is an informal phrase used to mean “without monetary value or defrayment.”
In any event, the impressive rise of “free people of” against “exempt from” over the past 100 years suggests that the English-speaking world has become more receptive to using “unloosen of” in place of “free people from” during that period. The statement, ‘You can take your baby on the flight free of charge’ would be in opposition to ‘You have to pay to take your baby on a plane’ or ‘It’s not free’, or informally, download top porn videos ‘You gotta pay for it’. To say something is not included (if, for example, popcorn weren’t free of charge, even with ticket) one could say ‘The popcorn is not included in the ticket price’. I don’t know that we’ve come up with a precise answer to the question. An example sentence would be really useful to show what you want the opposite of.