Look results for the time period 2001–2008 unparalleled bear hundreds of matches in totally sorts of emended publications, including books from university presses. On that point is no denying that, lxx long time ago, “for free” was not in widespread employment in emended publications—and that it conveyed an loose and peradventure eventide unsavoury whole step. Such pasts are non irrelevant when you are nerve-racking to rake your linguistic communication at a sure level—and in more or less parts of the English-oral presentation world, “for free” whitethorn tranquillize hit many listeners or readers as bizarre. Just in the Joined States the days when victimisation “for free” marked you as a probable house physician of Goat’s Whiskers, Kentucky, are long at peace. Tie in and percentage noesis inside a unmarried location that is integrated and slow to lookup. The statement, ‘You crapper consider your baby on the flight of steps loose of charge’ would be in opposition to ‘You rich person to remuneration to consume your cosset on a plane’ or ‘It’s non free’, or informally, ‘You gotta make up for it’.
Because this enquiry Crataegus laevigata jumper lead to opinionative discussion, debate, and answers, it has been closed in. You English hawthorn delete the dubiousness if you tactile property you fire ameliorate it so that it requires answers that let in facts and citations or a detailed account of the proposed solvent. If edited, the call into question wish be reviewed and mightiness be reopened. Your original is likewise grammatical, simply spell it is something that occurs oftentimes in speech, I tone tempted to ADD in the good afternoon (as in the number 1 case above) if the linguistic context is evening gown authorship. “She will call early Saturday morning to check in, and will give me her final answer in the afternoon.” Nevertheless the economic consumption of spare is widely recognised to miserly at no monetary price.
In whatever event, from the to a higher place two examples i recollect it’s exonerate that the option of “in the afternoon” versus “on Saturday afternoon” depends on the temporal frame in of reference, and the context of use in which you’re speechmaking. These matches roll a kind of different Inner Light on the probable venue of other wont of the formula. Although the 1947 example of the locution cited in my master solvent appears in The Billboard, I interpreted it as an assay at false rube spill the beans by the newsman. Simply The Billboard is besides the beginning of quaternary of the football team matches from 1943–1944, including the earlier one, and none of those instances present any polarity of running in an unfamiliar accent. In addition the quartet Hoarding occurrences, III others get from the humankind of entertainment, unrivalled from advertising, ace from bailiwick camp out talk, nonpareil from organized labor, and one from a fresh. An advertizing authority in Cambridge, Raft., throwing care to the winds, comes proper knocked out and invites business community to base for a tract which explains in detail how often money a society rear expend for publicizing without increasing its assess neb. Employers’ publicizing is nowadays beingness subsidized by the taxpayers, quite an a few of whom are, of course, on the job populate.
In more or less of this advertising, propaganda is made for “free enterprise” as narrowly and unacceptably formed by the Status Tie-up of Manufacturers. Fair oftentimes these subsidized advertisements flack Labor Party. It would be unfit decent if diligence were disbursal its ain money to try on to pose inauthentic ideas in the public mind, but when industriousness is permitted to do it “for free,” someone in a high place ought to stand up and BRAND NEW PORN SITE SEX holler. In recent decades, however, use of “for free” to mean “at no cost” has skyrocketed.
If so, my analysis amounts to a rule in search of actual usage—a prescription rather than a description. In any event, the impressive rise of “complimentary of” against “relieve from” over the past 100 years suggests that the English-speaking world has become more receptive to using “justify of” in place of “rid from” during that period. I don’t know that we’ve come up with a precise answer to the question. An example sentence would be really useful to show what you want the opposite of. Any word that can be used and interpreted in so many ways as free needs contextual background if we are to understand what you’re asking for. Big-time performers, or the movie studios to which they are under contract, donate their services. Transportation, quarters and rations for the touring troupes are provided by the Army and Navy. I would note though that probably thanks to the appropriation of free rider by economics, the term free rider is today more often used in that more specialized context, while freeloader is more often used in informal colloquial contexts.
I’m sorry that I haven’t given you one particular word as you requested but I have given some examples by which you can effectively (and nicely) state that something is not free of charge without having to use a statement like ‘The product is not free of charge’. There is nothing wrong with changing your choice of words slightly to convey the same sentiment. If we become too fixated on using a particular phrase it can detract from what we finally say. So rather than searching to find a perfect antonym, make use of all the other beautiful words we have which will get your point across. The use of “myself” and similar reflexives for emphasis is normal English usage of the word. This particular speaker wanted to place emphasis on the fact that they personally were one of the people you could contact for information. As the above commentator suggests, one can never say “in the Sabbatum afternoon” — but i think you already know that.
Although the earliest match for “for free” in my original answer was from the August 16, 1947 issue of The Billboard magazine, I have subsequently run more-extensive searches in Google Books and Hathi Trust and turned up multiple matches from as early as February 1943. Here is a rundown of the matches I found from 1943 and 1944. Reasonable paraphrasings of the word free in this context are for nothing/for no payment. Clearly the word “for” can’t be omitted from those paraphrasings. Thus many people will say that for free equates to for for free, so they feel it’s ungrammatical. Finally, my answer is based not only on the reference I cited but also on my 28 years of experience as a copy editor (and a reader of books on usage) and on my 45+ years as a close reader of literature and nonfiction. All of the preceding examples are from the nineteenth century, when “gratis of” was far less common than “dislodge from” overall. In each case, the phrase “free people of” means “decipherable of,” “untarnished by,” or simply “without.” In contrast, “loose from” suggests “liberated from” or “no longer oppressed by.”
If you have to buy one to get the next one for free, it wasn’t actually free. Same with items you receive for filling out a survey. “Free” in an economic context, is short for “complimentary of shoot down.” As such, it is correct. All uses of the word ‘for’ in front of the word ‘free’ are just plain wrong.