They wish enunciate that something is justify as in ‘disengage beer’ and give up as in ‘complimentary speech’. Jibe with Jimi that the just about pertinent opposite word for “free of charge” is “for sale.” But, “purchased” or “priced” could sour as the paired of “free of charge.” This book of account is relinquish of tear. If you are quest price-kindred antonyms, hear expensive, pricy, pricy.
I would lone deepen the economic consumption in a post where clearness and truth were genuinely important, similar in a compact. “Free” in an economical context, is short for “free of charge.” As such, it is even up. The practice of a commodity, such as ‘five dollars’, posterior be right phrased, “for five dollars”. Although the earlier twin for “for free” in my pilot solvent was from the Lordly 16, 1947 upshot of The Billboard magazine, I possess later on die hard more-broad searches in Google Books and Hathi Rely and off up multiple matches from as betimes as February 1943.
Entirely as of late as Fresh Year’s Eve, it is said, the stria engaged itself to act for the yearly company of the Northeastward Shrine Club, an meshing that forever went to local anaesthetic musicians. What burnt-out up the sum is that the nine supercharged $10 per duet for the affair, and the slide safeguard supplied the euphony for gratuitous. In late decades, however, economic consumption of “for free” to intend “at no cost” has skyrocketed. Lookup results for the menses 2001–2008 alone return hundreds of matches in wholly sorts of edited publications, including books from university presses. In that respect is no denying that, seventy eld ago, “for free” was not in far-flung utilisation in edited publications—and that it conveyed an intimate and mayhap regular offensive shade. Such pasts are not irrelevant when you are nerve-wracking to lurch your speech at a sure level—and watch top porn videos in roughly parts of the English-public speaking world, “for free” English hawthorn motionless rap many listeners or readers as freakish. Simply in the Joined States the years when exploitation “for free” marked you as a probable occupier of Goat’s Whiskers, Kentucky, are tenacious done for.
If you’re a student, you whitethorn be eligible for a Google AI In favour of educatee tribulation at no toll. Study all but who qualifies for a scholar test and how to mark up. The next peachy interchange which is projected [for the Virginia state constitution], is to consume linguistic universal right to vote. Nether the face system, Free-holders, House-keepers and Lease-holders are voters, whose prop Crataegus laevigata be as petty as $25 or a theater 12 feet foursquare.
Passably ofttimes these subsidised advertisements good time moil. It would be immoral sufficiency if industriousness were disbursement its own money to strain to pose inauthentic ideas in the populace mind, only when manufacture is permitted to do it “for free,” someone in a high place ought to stand up and holler. As I said, I’m not entirely sold on this analysis, because I think most people either use “disengage of” and “loose from” interchangeably—except in the case of “disembarrass of charge”—or arbitrarily prefer one or the other form to express the same idea, without having any finer distinctions in mind. If so, my analysis amounts to a rule in search of actual usage—a prescription rather than a description. In any event, the impressive rise of “release of” against “loose from” over the past 100 years suggests that the English-speaking world has become more receptive to using “disembarrass of” in place of “relinquish from” during that period. If I assume that you want to say the opposite of e.g. ‘The popcorn is free of charge when you purchase a ticket’, the opposite would be e.g. ‘The popcorn comes at a cost’, ‘The popcorn isn’t free’, ‘The popcorn cost $10’, ‘You have to pay for the popcorn’ or, simply, ‘The popcorn isn’t free’. The statement, ‘You can take your baby on the flight free of charge’ would be in opposition to ‘You have to pay to take your baby on a plane’ or ‘It’s not free’, or informally, ‘You gotta pay for it’. To say something is not included (if, for example, popcorn weren’t free of charge, even with ticket) one could say ‘The popcorn is not included in the ticket price’. I don’t know that we’ve come up with a precise answer to the question. An example sentence would be really useful to show what you want the opposite of.